Exposing the FYROMian lies about tzar Samuel

 

Written medieval sources
About king Samuel (997-1014)

JOHN SKYLITZES, SYNOPSIS HISTORION The Battle of Kleidion, 29 July 1014
…The emperor did not relent, but every year he marched into Bulgaria and laid waste and ravaged all before him. Samuel was not able to resist openly, nor to face the emperor in open warfare, so, weakened from all sides, he came down from his lofty lair to fortify the entrance to Bulgaria with ditches and fences…”

CHRONICLE OF THE PRIEST OF DUKLJA (Ljetopis’ Popa Dukljanina)
“…Tugemir succeeded to the kingdom. Having taken a wife he sired a son whom he named Chvalimir. At that time, among the race of Bulgars , a certain Samuel commanded that he be called emperor, fought many battles with the Greeks, and drove them completely from Bulgaria . During his reign the Greeks did not dare approach that land…”

Michael Psellus – Chronographia
39. The people of Bulgaria, after many vicissitudes of fortune and after frequent battles in the past, had become subjects of the Roman Empire . That prince of emperors, the famous Basil, had deliberately attacked their country and destroyed their power. For some time the Bulgarians, being completely exhausted after pitting their strength against the might of the Romans, resigned themselves to defeat, but later they reverted to the old arrogance. There were no immediate signs of open revolt, however, until the appearance among them of a political agitator, when their policy at once became hostile to the Empire.

40. The man who moved them to this folly was, in their opinion, a marvel. He was of their own race, member of a family unworthy of mention, but cunning, and capable of practising any deceit on his compatriots, a fellow called Dolianus. I do not know whether he inherited such a name from his father, or if he gave himself the name for an omen. He knew that the whole nation was set on rebellion against the Romans; indeed, the revolt was merely a project only because no leader had hitherto risen up among them able to carry out their plans. In the first place, therefore, he made himself conspicuous, proved his ability in council, demonstrated his skill in the conduct of war. Then, having won their approval by these qualities, it only remained for him to prove his own noble descent, in order to become the acknowledged leader of the Bulgarians. (It was their custom to recognize as leaders of the nation only men of royal blood.) Knowing this to be the national custom, he proceeded to trace his descent from the famous Samuel and his brother Aaron, who had ruled the whole nation as kings a short time before. He did not claim to be the legitimate heir of these kings, but he either invented or proved that he was a collateral relation. He readily convinced the people with his story, and they raised him on the shield. He was proclaimed king. From that moment Bulgarian designs became manifest, for they seceded openly. The yoke of Roman domination was hurled from their necks and they made a declaration of independence, emphasizing the fact that they took this course of their own free will. Whereupon they engaged in attacks and plundering expeditions on Roman territory

Anna Comnena: “The Alexiad”, Book VII
…Samuel, the last of the Bulgarian dynasty…

The miniature “After the Siege of Salonica, the army of Tsar Samuel assassinated its mayor Gregorios Taronitos”, from the Chronicle of John Skilitzes (The National Library – Madrid). The ethnicity of Samuil and his warriors is written right above their heads – Boulgaroi.

samoil.madrid.1 Exposing the FYROMian lies about tzar Samuel

Want more of this? See these Posts:

  1. Czar Samuel of Bulgaria
  2. Fyromian lies over Slavic populations genetics Part II
  3. Exposing FYROM’s Fashionable Nonsense #1: “Greek was the lingua franca before Alexander the Great’s era like English is today”
  4. Mother Teresa Never Said she was FYROMian!
  5. Truths and lies about Macedonia – Part 1
Comments