The Obama Administration Must Push for Fyrom’s Accession to NATO at the Lisbon Summit

 

The Obama Administration Must Push for Fyrom’s Accession to NATO at the Lisbon Summit

Published on October 14, 2010 by Sally McNamara and Morgan Roach

On November 19, NATO leaders will meet in Lisbon for a formal heads-of-state summit. The dominant issue for the United States will be the adoption of NATO’s new Strategic Concept, the first of the new millennium. However, the Obama Administration should also throw its weight behind further expansion of the alliance, especially Fyrom’s accession.
Fyrom has been on the road to membership for over a decade and has successfully completed NATO’s Membership Action Plan. Despite being one of the largest per capita contributors to the NATO mission in Afghanistan and enjoying broad support for its accession across the alliance, Athens continues to unfairly wield its veto power and block Fyrom’s accession over a purely bilateral dispute.[1]
Over the past year, Greece has received enormous financial and political support from the Euro-Atlantic community and the global financial institutions. Consequently, it is time for Greece to reciprocate that friendship and uphold its obligation under Article 10 of the Washington Treaty. The Greco–Fyromian name dispute has dragged on for 18 years, and it may not be resolved in time for the Lisbon Summit.[2] However, Athens should not bring its bilateral disputes into the alliance—a longstanding NATO principle—and instead demonstrate its willingness to be a positive regional player rather than a truculent and obstructionist partner.

Window of Opportunity

At the Bucharest Summit in 2008, Albania and Croatia received invitations to NATO membership and took their seats at the alliance’s table in Strasbourg in 2009. It was nothing short of diplomatic hostility on Athens’s part that Fyrom could not join them. Following the Bucharest debacle, parliamentary elections were called in Fyrom, two years ahead of schedule. The elections were held in a tense atmosphere and were directly related to Greece’s continued obstructionism and Fyrom’s exclusion from the Euro–Atlantic family.
Although Fyrom is a vibrant multi-ethnic democracy, its progress remains nascent, and its patience is not endless. Its democratic development has been directly supported by the U.S. and all other members of the NATO alliance save Greece. It is important that the transatlantic alliance sends the message that there is a place in its institutions for Balkan nations that have earned it.

A Provider—Not Just a Consumer—of Security

Having been a primary consumer of security in the past, Fyrom has quickly made the transition to being a provider of security, both regionally and globally. Although Skopje does not enjoy the benefits of NATO membership, it has advanced NATO’s core mission of providing for the collective defense. Fyrom was a critical staging area for the NATO intervention in Kosovo and provided a safe haven for over 360,000 Kosovars during the conflict.[3] Macedonia continues to provide logistical coordination and support for the Kosovo Force mission.
One of the most impressive acts of good faith by Fyrom has been its robust participation in the NATO mission in Afghanistan. Despite having a population a fifth the size of Greece’s, Skopje has deployed more troops than Athens has to Afghanistan. Maintaining a commitment of 240 troops, Fyrom is one of the largest per capita contributors to the mission, providing security at NATO headquarters in Kabul.[4]
Fyrom also takes part in the crucial Operational Mentor and Liaison Teams program tasked with training the Afghan National Security Forces.[5] Fyrom sent additional trainers following President Obama’s request for support at the Strasbourg Summit in April 2009, as well as additional troops following another U.S. request in December 2009.[6]
Fyrom also supported the U.S. and its coalition partners in Iraq from 2003 onward, carrying out joint and independent combat missions. The 2-11 Field Artillery Battalion Commander, Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Gleichenhaus, stated of Fyrom’s contribution in Iraq: “My only reservation about the Fyromians is that we don’t have more of them.”[7]

U.S. Support: Is It Enough?

Skopje has enjoyed the support of both the former and current U.S. Administration in its quest for accession. At the Strasbourg summit, President Obama voiced his eagerness to welcome Fyrom into the alliance, and recently 19 Congressmen—from both sides of the House—outlined their support for Fyrom’s accession at the Lisbon Summit.[8]
However, U.S. support will not be enough to secure Fyrom’s accession. The Administration will have to use its diplomatic channels in Europe, in concert with U.S. representatives in Athens, to increase international pressure on Greece to resolve this matter expeditiously. Significant diplomatic pressure will have to be applied on Athens by Europe as well, especially France and Germany, and the U.S. should ask Berlin and Paris to make this issue a priority for the summit.

Time for Fyrom to Join

The U.N.-mediated talks between Greece and Fyrom will continue even if Fyrom accedes to the alliance. In a 1995 interim accord between the two nations, Greece pledged not to abuse its dominant position and block Fyrom’s entry into international institutions. Since its inception, NATO enlargement has proven to be a hallmark of European integration, and Fyrom has more than earned its place in the alliance. The U.S. and key European allies including Britain, France, and Germany should stand by their friends and intensify its efforts to ensure that Skopje’s place at the table is no longer unfairly blocked.

Sally McNamara is Senior Policy Analyst in European Affairs and Morgan L. Roach is a Research Assistant in the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, a division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies, at The Heritage Foundation.

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Rep…-Lisbon-Summit

Want more of this? See these Posts:

  1. PM Gruevski´s hardline policy leaves FYROM out of NATO summit yet again
  2. Reeker warns FYROM : “No Name Solution, No Accession to NATO and EU”
  3. Opposition Slams FYROM PM Over “Anti-NATO” Comments
  4. Macedonia News : FYROM Media speak about Fiasco in the upcoming NATO summit
  5. London Wikileaks Cables:HMG WILL CONTINUE TO ENGAGE WITH ATHENS AND SKOPJE NAME/NATO ACCESSION ISSUE
Comments
macedonas says:

Ms. McNamara seems to have a lob sided view on most things that touch upon Greece. One might go so far as to say she is deeply biased in her views.
If you think that this article reflects her expertise in Balkan affairs then go read her article of May 6th 2010 titled “Five Reasons Not to Support a Bailout of Greece”.
There you will see that Ms. McNamara is also very informed on international monetary affairs and strongly believes that Greece should not be given any loans by Europe or the IMF (synonym of US?)
A few minutes ago I saw a tweet from her asking for an explanation of the phrase “Idou I fili mas”. She mentioned in her tweet that she suspected it was not generous and that it was emailed to her by a diplomat. Of course I explained to her that it means “here comes our friend” and asked her why she thought it may not be generous. I wonder if she will answer my tweet.

macedonas says:

Having read the webmemo by Sally McNamara titled " The Obama Administration Must Push for Macedonia’s Accession to NATO at the Lisbon Summit " I can say that it is a disgraceful article which cannot seriously be cosidered as a product of accurate research on the matter.
I cannot believe that this is typical of the work that researchers of the foundation do on all key policy issues otherwise members of Congress would be the most misinformed people on this earth.