VN:F [1.8.1_1037]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
Quote:
The issue was to be of great importance after World War II. However in the nineteenth century the term Macedonian was used almost exclusively to refer to the geographic region; the Macedonians were usually not considered a nationality separate from the Bulgarians, Greeks, Serbs, or Albanians. The diplomatic records of the period make no clear mention of a separate Macedonian nation. At the time of the Constantinople conference of 1876 and the Congress of Berlin, as we have seen, the representantives of the great powers considered the region to be of an extremely mixed ethnic composition, but predominantly Bulgarian. The second major claimant was believed to be Greece, with Serbia in a weak third place.

History of the Balkans By Barbara Jelavich, page 91

Share and Enjoy:
  • JeQQ
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • Blue Dot
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • DZone
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Gwar
  • kick.ie
  • Linkter
  • Netscape
  • ppnow
  • Reddit
  • Simpy
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Taggly
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • Webride
  • YahooMyWeb
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Want more of this? See these Posts:

  1. William Milligan Sloane – The Balkans : a laboratory of history – 1914
  2. When was the first time the word “Macedonia” was defined to include lands of the nowadays Rep. of Skopje?
  3. The Birth of a Clone State
  4. Population of Skopje Through History – Contemporary Sources
  5. Edward J. Erickson – Defeat in Detail: The Ottoman Army in the Balkans, 1912-1913″
Tags: , ,

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Site speeded up by PHP Speedy Site speeded up by PHP Speedy